| Author |
Discussion |
Kree_Boy
Teacher
Posts: 446
My Collection
|
|
|
|
jkoswald
Wise Beyond the Years
lifetime member
Posts: 1437
My Collection
|
- Posted: August 24, 2008 11:13:25 pm
- wow, strange how it is.....I absolutely hated the 13th warrior....but fight club would be my #2 as well...
|
1573
Wise Beyond the Years
lifetime member Location: st. michaels, maryland
Posts: 4038
My Collection
|
- Posted: August 24, 2008 11:50:56 pm
- i'll see what i can find.
although it's gonna be tricky since my #2 and #3 aren't single movies.
they're a trilogy and a part 1 & 2 combo.
|
jkoswald
Wise Beyond the Years
lifetime member
Posts: 1437
My Collection
|
- Posted: August 24, 2008 11:58:37 pm
- that is sad, i cannot imagine having to watch at least 6 hours of movie just to love it that much, good think you work with movies, or I would assume you would never be able to watch the whole thing...don't get me wrong, i love long movies...assuming they need to be long (no movie made in the eighties was good because they all were longer than they needed to be.....and the star wars trilogy are all 70's movies because the second two follow the spirit of the first one which was a 70's movie)....don't get me wrong, I really enjoy Indiana Jones, but even they should have been cut a bit shorter
|
1573
Wise Beyond the Years
lifetime member Location: st. michaels, maryland
Posts: 4038
My Collection
|
- Posted: August 25, 2008 12:15:28 am
- yes, the initial p;ost does call for 3 (and only 3) movies.
however, my problem is, w/ the trilogy at #2, all 3 parts together make it great (to me anyway).
and the same w/ the parts 1 & 2 in my #3 spot, both together make it worth watching.
to just eliminate both and bump my #'s 4 and 5 up wouldn't be fair to the actual #'s 2 and 3.
|
jkoswald
Wise Beyond the Years
lifetime member
Posts: 1437
My Collection
|
- Posted: August 25, 2008 12:33:14 am
- that is sad, i cannot imagine having to watch at least 6 hours of movie just to love it that much, good think you work with movies, or I would assume you would never be able to watch the whole thing...don't get me wrong, i love long movies...assuming they need to be long (no movie made in the eighties was good because they all were longer than they needed to be.....and the star wars trilogy are all 70's movies because the second two follow the spirit of the first one which was a 70's movie)....don't get me wrong, I really enjoy Indiana Jones, but even they should have been cut a bit shorter
|
1573
Wise Beyond the Years
lifetime member Location: st. michaels, maryland
Posts: 4038
My Collection
|
- Posted: August 25, 2008 1:01:32 am
- i can enjoy the 3 parts of the trilogy individually.
but they make my favorite movies list as a group.
i agree, there is nothing wrong w/ a long movie if it needs to be that long.
however, i have seen plenty that DO NOT need that extra 10, 15 or 20 minutes.
, there are plenty that i could very easily shorten at he theater.
i have the "know how" and the meens to do so.
unfortunately, i do not have the authority.
the movie companies don't tend to appreciate someone "editing" their films after release.
|
tuesdaysdusk
Comic Guru
moderator 
Location: Arkham
Posts: 616
My Collection
|
|
|
8 posts • Page 1 of 1
|
free price guide and tracking database
