Author |
Discussion |
fsjeter
Comic Guru
lifetime member Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 890
My Collection
|
|
|
L0ngB0x
Grasshopper
lifetime member Location: NJ
Posts: 131
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 11, 2014 11:03:48 am
- this seems strange but i think maybe they might mean spidergirl and maybe they have the names mixed up... it would be funny if dc tried to top this with an alfred movie rofl
|
junobeach
Wise Beyond the Years
moderator
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Posts: 2148
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 11, 2014 11:23:48 am
- I wish Sony would just give up so Marvel studios could get Spider-Man back.
|
Rapha1978
Comic Guru
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 938
My Collection
|
|
glh08
Wise Beyond the Years
moderator
Location: Mapleton, ND
Posts: 2870
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 12, 2014 11:30:28 pm
Rapha1978 said: What a horrible idea. It's a sign of desperation from Sony. They might as well just make the next trilogy based on the Clone Saga.
Don't give them any ideas.
|
mrhan1
Comic Guru
Location: California
Posts: 703
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 17, 2014 2:02:32 pm
- Sony is just throwing sh*t on the wall to see what sticks and make movies so they can hold on to the rights. Same with FOX in regards to FF. Everyone can see Marvel is totally disassociating themselves with the current FF that's in production.
|
fsjeter
Comic Guru
lifetime member Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 890
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 17, 2014 4:33:54 pm
- I had heard that Marvel was trying to entice Sony in to giving up the Spider-Man franchise. I hope they succeed so Spidey can appear in some of the Avengers films but it doesn't look promising.
|
kewilson
Comic Guru
lifetime member Location: Canada
Posts: 525
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 19, 2014 11:10:35 am
- I think Sony and Fox does stuff like this just to us off. They know how to push our buttons.....
What I hear Fox is doing with FF is just......unacceptable to me. Why ruin the first family of comics? I didn't think they 1st two FF movies were THAT bad....I really enjoyed them. They could have had more substance but it's ok. At least it stayed on track, and had a moral at the end.
I don't see how Aunt May can carry her own movie without Spider-Man. I think even a Sinister Six movie without Spider-Man is pushing it.
I was disappointed that ASM 1 and 2 didn't do as well as they had hoped for. Those 2 movies were good. I'm going to say better than the 1st trilogy.
But now, the bar is set with The Avengers for superhero movies. Anything that doesn't achieve the greatness of Avengers will be in its shadow. Sony and Fox better understand that.....fast; before they embarrass themselves.
|
bluebullitt01
Collector in Training
Location: Midwest
Posts: 99
My Collection
|
|
kewilson
Comic Guru
lifetime member Location: Canada
Posts: 525
My Collection
|
- Posted: November 21, 2014 12:29:34 pm
- I think Andrew Garfield is a great Peter Parker, but for some reason the stories seem rushed in the 1st two movies. They aren't fleshed out enough. It's like there were a ton of ideas that they had for the film and they just kindof mashed them together into one movie. I think because of this the characters suffer. That's my opinion anyway.
I love Sam Raimi, but I think Spider-Man 3 suffered this way too. I don't really think it was what Raimi wanted. Tobey MacGuire was alright as Spider-Man too, but I overlooked his shortcomings because it was the first Spider-Man movie out there.
Garfield is what I envision for what Peter Parker would look like in the real world but when I say it feels rushed, there was little character development. They don't show where he works, there were only a few short scenes with Aunt May, almost no talk about Uncle Ben in ASM 2. It was more love story than anything. They didn't show the ANGST that makes Peter Parker who he is. They did that in the original movies moreso so maybe they didn't want to repeat that.
|
12 posts • Page 1 of 2
|